Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘copenhagen accord’

It took me until late Tuesday afternoon to figure it out. After a morning walk on snowy Copenhagen cobblestones, flight to Heathrow, train to South Kensington (and back), and the heavenly purple clouds outside my plane window, I checked in to the last leg of my journey, a Westjet flight from Calgary to Vernon-home. When the fact I was en route from Copenhagen came up with the check-in agent, she asked me how it went.

As you may know, the UNFCCC 15th Conference of the Parties (COP15) came to a close in the morning hours of December 19th, with the inking of the “Copenhagen Accord”. Many consider the accord to be a failure, as it is neither legally binding, nor particularly ambitious, and leaves pretty much all major decisions until some time in the future. It certainly does not live up the the promise that was “Copenhagen”.

Like everyone who attended the conference at Bella Center in fair Copenhagen, as well as much of the rest of the world, I had been trying to decide if the conference was a failure or not. And in that moment of clarity at the Westjet counter, I realized that my answer was “Changing the world is hard, what were you expecting?”

For all of those who’s lives revolve around solving climate change, we’ve been fighting for a good long time, and will surely find the imperative to fight for a good long time more. There were thousands of people at the COP that have been dedicated to this work for over a decade. I myself have been living and breathing the work for the last five years, first with Brinkman, and then with CPS Carbon Project Solutions Inc. If there is a single thing that one learns in this space, and within the greater environmental realm, it is that though the solutions may be obvious, that path to achieving them is damn hard.

Science and logic tell us that climate change is happening, it is being accelerated in the direction of a global warming by our actions, and that we really don’t want to feel its effects. The meeting in Copenhagen was seized upon as the solution by a world grown more aware and alarmed by this imperative. As the polar icecaps melt, and weather extremes become compellingly different, it is clear to many people that the game is up, and we need to make a change. What was the fifteenth annual roundup for the ongoing negotiations of the United Nations Convention on Climate Change, a Conference of the Parties titled “COP15” became known as “Copenhagen” and subsequently synonymous with “hope”.

A lot of hopes were crushed that day, Saturday Dec. 19th, as news spread that a small, unfinished accord was replacing the hundreds of pages and thousands of hours of negotiations, and the dream of a global binding agreement signed this decade. The thought comes rather quickly: Climate change is a clear and present danger; if we can’t agree on tackling it now, with 120+ heads of state and the publicity juggernaut, when can we?

I as well share that profound concern. But all of this does not dim the beauty that did shine in Copenhagen. For all the setbacks, I know the people working in the trenches of climate change endeavour will be immeasurably bouyed by the groundswell of public support coming out the last year. After (hopefully) a lil holiday’s rest, “Copenhagen” will light a fire in the hearts, and under the bums, of those crafting positive policy, mobilizing the people, developing the carbon market, pioneering new technologies and commercializing the existing solutions that need but scale to achieve our task.

lilcarbon is going to talk a lot more about the nitty gritty, the nuts and bolts of how these solutions come into play, and the kinds of actions that must be driven by the building framework Copenhagen set out to create. But for today, the clear success of Copenhagen was a mobilization of people, from all parts of society, calling for change. This is the only force, applied within the machinations of democracy as well as the overarching spirit of human determination, with which we can meet the challenge of halting climate change.

Copenhagen is not the end-game, but rather a vigorous skirmish. So rest a little this Christmas day. Laugh and smile with your loved ones, dust off your boots. Bolster yourself for another year’s efforts in a fight we can win together.

Read Full Post »

Significantly below expectations, yet at a spot that perches a global climate agreement at a spot for it to move forward on sound principles, COP15 has ended and a deal reached. Called the “Copenhagen Accord”, a UN document that acts somewhat like a memorandum of understanding before the full contract has achieved consensus by the countries of the world.

Key details of the Copenhagen Accord are as follows:

• The developed world will commit to reducing global emissions of greenhouse gases by 80% below 1990 levels by 2050. Mention of a global reduction of 50% by 2050 removed as developing world was unwilling to commit to such a target.

• Draft text indicates that voluntary cuts by the developing world will be “subject to international measurement, reporting, and verification (MRV).” This was watered down in the final version, but retains a commitment to the principle.

• Those wishing for an actionable outcome on Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD+) were left unfulfilled, as no mechanisms were agreed upon. Under the Copenhagen Accord, text refers to the fact that countries recognize the vital role of reducing deforestation in halting climate change, which provides a placeholder for future talks. lilcarbon will dig deeper into the REDD+ question in the coming weeks.

• The developed countries will commit to providing $100 billion a year by 2020 “to address the needs of developing countries.” This has begun with a range of quick-start funding mechanisms in the 2010-2012 period.

• In a hopeful, but ultimately bizarre move, parties to the agreement will review the accord by 2016 and decide whether stiffer cuts are needed. This helps address the concerns of a group of smaller nations, which had been pressing for a goal of keeping the planet’s temperature increase below 1.5 degrees C. Current emissions reductions commitments under the Accord translate to an expected warming of at least 2 to 3 degrees.

After a lil period of rest, recuperation and reflection, it’ll be time to get back to work and craft this into a legally binding document by June for a UN meeting in Bonn, or into a “Mexico Protocol” at COP16.

Read Full Post »